What are they talkin' about?
1000 Important Things
age
Ali
arguement
Art
authors
Beatles
beauty
Bible
books
Calvin and Hobbes
change
children
comedy
comics/cartoons
courage
dancing
daredevils
Death
diapers
Dr. Suess
dreams
ecology
Edison
Education
Einstein
ethics
facial hair
failure
faith
fame
food
Gandhi
Greeks
happiness
Holocaust
ideas
imagination
inspiration
insult
justice
leadership
liberty
Life
love
magic
math
mothers
music
my parents
pacifism
parenting
peace
Peanuts
perseverance
perspective
poetry
prayer
Presidents
problem solving
race
respect
risk
Romans
Saints
Shakespeare
sin
soul
spelling
sports
Springsteen
talent
talking animals
technology
truth
Twain
universe
violence
Vonnegut
war
wisdom
women
work
writing
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
It's funny (or ironic?), but I a few days after posting this my Dad and I had a heated (yet civil) discussion about the choice to do violence to another person. Under our violence conversation was of course the issue of the righteousness and glorification of war, the current one and others, but seeing as how we were out in the carport on thanksgiving night, Mom decided the convo needed to be cut short. But part of what he was saying was that there is not only the choice to do violence (i.e., drop the bombs) but also the choice to receive the violence -- to be in the place where the bombs will be dropped... Does this have merit? Or is it rationalization to assuage guilt?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment